Names Friday, Nov 27 2009
personal 10:43 pm
From Joey Comeau’s Overqualified, which I previously reviewed:
It’s Joey, not Joe or Joseph. My grandfather was Joe Comeau, and Joseph is my mother’s name for me, but I have always been Joey. I worry sometimes that it’s a childish name. Would a “Joe” tell jokes in bed, perform puppet shows after sex, and give every body part a different high-pitched voice? It seems unlikely. The names we choose for ourselves aren’t meaningless. They’re self-fulfilling prophecies.
When I was a kid, my mother called me Robby. It was just the name I went by, and I was fine with it for a while. Then at some point I decided I didn’t like that, and I told her that my name was Robert, and that I would like to be called Robert, if it’s all the same to her.
I remember feeling that Robby was a silly name, and that I wanted to be taken seriously, so I would wear a serious name. My grandfather was Bob, and that was fine for him, but I would be Robert. There’s still a chair at my dad’s house that has “Robby” written on the back. It bothered me when I was a kid.
Sometimes I wonder if that was a mistake.
In late high school my name stopped really mattering. Maybe before then, but by then everyone was calling me Mason and it didn’t bother me. I had no preference. I even preferred it to Robert sometimes. Robert is a name I never liked seeing typed. So when I made a Myspace profile, back when that was a thing that you did, I put my name as Rob. I didn’t figure it would matter.
But then a few people called me Rob, and suddenly I had a new name. I used it in a few other places. It suited me: it didn’t speak to me of anything in particular. So, with the exception of my family, I was now either Rob or Mason. There were distinct groups which stuck with one or the other, and they mostly stuck with their own. It was here that I started letting other people introduce me, so there would be no confusion.
Then I moved to Boston and there were no more distinct groups, and I had to do the introducing myself. People never quite knew what to call me. Sometimes an introduction required explanation.
I keep going back to the time when I was a kid, though. I couldn’t have been more than 3 or 4 years old. I decided then I wanted to be taken seriously, and I gave myself a name that would be taken seriously. Would I have been different if I was Robby?
I can’t bring it back. You can’t just change your name. It’s an organic process. But I wonder.
November 27th, 2009 at 11:14 pm
You would make an excellent “Bobby,” actually.
November 28th, 2009 at 3:20 am
I understand completely. When I was a kid I refused to let anyone call me Meg, because I wanted to be taken seriously and to me that meant the use of my full name (I too wonder if this was a mistake). It’s really only when I started using the internet that the use of “Meg” appeared - a lot like your Rob/Myspace thing.
These days, I’m exclusively Meg to some people, and exclusively Meagan to others. My family uses both names (except my mom has a tendency to call me Meg Anne). Sometimes I introduce myself as Meagan, then I regret it later when those people turn out to be the sort of people who would normally call me Meg, and it becomes disconcerting. I always pause before introducing myself, trying to decide which name to start out with, and I wonder if it makes a difference. Are Meg and Meagan slightly different people? I don’t really know.
November 28th, 2009 at 10:50 am
My name started out as a joke between friends and then became something I embraced on a full-time basis. Eventually it became my legal name and I’m quite happy about it.
November 28th, 2009 at 8:54 pm
That is interesting! I remember you mentioning the name change thing. Also I think you asked about the story behind my name once. Now you know! Maybe.
November 30th, 2009 at 10:52 pm
christin: there is only one person who calls me that and it is as a Bound Stems reference.
toast: I am glad I am not alone in this